![]() For example, if you have initially set a virtual drive to 10 GB and you want to upgrade it to 15 GB, it's not that easy." "In our setup, we do not have any dashboards or orchestration, and it is hard to manage. One of VMware's advantages is it has better support." "There are some issues with the graphics and some software that is very complex." "Monitoring and resolution could be improved." "Its resource usage can be improved." "One problem I have is that it's not very scalable when it comes to resizing the VM disk dimensions. However, they both have their strengths depending on their use cases. This type of improvement will make it easy or help our engineers understand the solution from a requirement point of view." "I have previously used VMware and KVM is easier to use. In the next release, I would like to see an improved user interface and dashboard. When it comes to the network the VMware is more flexible than Hyper-V." ![]() The checkpoints or snapshots could be improved to make it a bit more transparent to the user." "One of the network problems I face is I cannot introduce other security layers on top of Hyper-V as you can in VMware. The replication could be improved slightly. Various virtual switches could also be improved to make virtual desk management slightly better. It's easy to attack and compromise the host." "I have found it difficult to manage more than one virtual machine." "The Hyper-V management console could be improved to make it easier. Also, Hyper-V has security vulnerabilities. Additionally, they could provide some form of multi-cloud integration." "The management interface is in need of the biggest improvement." "I also use VMware which I find to be more scalable and stable overall." "Hyper-V doesn't have a lot of features and is limited compared to other virtualization software." "The biggest problem with Hyper-V is that the virtual machines are mostly running on top of the Windows Server, so we often need to reboot the machine and virtual machines when updating the host level. We are all moving towards the clouds and the integration is only through the Azure Stack, there should be tools built in to move the VMs natively to the cloud and infrastructure. "In an upcoming release, they can improve by having better cloud integration. They work wonderfully together." "The most valuable features are ease of use, and it gets the job done in a straightforward manner." "The installation was straightforward." If you are looking for a hundred percent Microsoft environment it would be a good idea to go with Hyper-V. There are so many features that they have embedded in Hyper-V that are useful." "The solution is very powerful, easy to use, user-friendly, and integrates well with Windows. This is because they require more features and memory. When installing the interface with the Windows version, we also install the Hyper-V feature on the server. In Sri Lanka, most of the customers use the Hyper-V GUI. I like to use VMware because of the resource requirements. Initial setup in the Windows environment for any software is not that difficult." "The most valuable feature of the solution is the storage virtualization." "I like that Hyper-V is like a virtual environment. We input one command or just one or two clicks on the UI. "The solution is stable and the cost is reasonable." "The solution is highly stable." "The initial setup is simple. Hyper-V, as a Microsoft product, also offers stable and ongoing customer support. In addition, there is an active KVM open-source community.Ĭomparison Results: Hyper-V is the clear winner in this comparison it is easy to install, robust and high performing. There are several companies that offer paid support for the KVM platform. KVM is open-source and does not provide official support. Service and Support: Hyper-V users are, for the most part, satisfied with the level of support they receive.KVM is open-source and therefore free of charge. Pricing: Hyper-V users say that the solution is inexpensive.KVM users say that the solution is easy to manage and secure but needs to improve its scalability. Several Hyper-V users say that the product demands a high amount of memory. Features: Hyper-V users report that it is stable, scalable, high performing, and user-friendly.Ease of Deployment: Users of both Hyper-V and KVM report that the initial setup and deployment of both products is straightforward and fast.After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below We performed a comparison between Hyper-V and KVM based on our users’ reviews in four categories.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |